Is BD-DOS lost to time?

This is the best place to discuss about the various Oric operating systems like Sedoric, Randos, FT-Dos, and others, as well as serious software, utilities, word processors, disassemblers, etc... that runs on oric computers.
ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

BD-DOS, for the Byte Drive 500, is mentioned on the Wikipedia Oric page and reported on non-Oric forums as though it were primarily an Oric device. It appears in photographic form in CEO-Mag #272.

Has anyone preserved BD-DOS and/or any technical information for potential emulation?

User avatar
Dbug
Site Admin
Posts: 3374
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by Dbug »

Maybe the simplest would be to contact the guy on the forum post you linked.

Apparently the two authors of the Byte Drive 500 are Paul Simpson and Peter Halford working at Tyrell Computers, which happens to match at least one person on Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-simpson-23910112/

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Probably the actual easiest thing for answering these sort of questions for myself would be to learn French.

Pulling on that thread there seem to be articles in both CEO-Mag #154 and 155. So a quick subscription to that is probably the best plan.

User avatar
iss
Wing Commander
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:43 pm
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by iss »

euphoric-bddos.png
euphoric-bddos.png (39.09 KiB) Viewed 3495 times
(All thanks go to Fabrice Frances (aka Euphoric him self :)).
Attached is ZIP file with Euphoric emulator configured with Byte Drive 500 ROM and auto-booting bddos.dsk.
I run it with DosBox under Linux:

Code: Select all

cd euphoric
dosbox -conf euphoric.conf
This is everything that I know and have related to BD500/BDDOS.
Actually I played shortly with the DOS and I'm really impressed and I like it!

So, if anyone can provide more technical info about used I/O space, RAM Ovl switch, etc. - it will be very helpful and we can add support in Oricutron and CLK Signal ;).
Attachments
euphoric-bddos.zip
(259.24 KiB) Downloaded 70 times

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Fantastic, amazing! I'm sure we can figure it out from the ROM and a disk image.

Given that the intention of the Byte Disk was to be the disk drive for every platform, showing only the relevant files on each, it might also be fun to try to figure out the on-disk format. There's possibly non-Oric versions of BD-DOS on that disk too.

EDIT: other than 6502 vectors, this is a complete disassembly of the ROM, by the way:

Code: Select all

E000   78         SEI			; Disable interrupts.
E001   A9 08      LDA #$08
E003   8D 20 03   STA $0320		; Store 8 to $0320; assuming that to be a WD command
					; register, that's a restore, with either:
					;
					;	no spin-up sequence, if a WD177x; or
					;	a set head-load request and wait for head load response, if a 179x.
					;
					; => a 179x, almost certainly, with a Microdisc-esque capacity to switch the
					; motor on upon a head load request, and indicate head loaded in response.


E006   2C 12 03   BIT $0312		; Loop until bit 6 of $0312 is set. Bit 6 of $0312 is the WD's IRQ line,
E009   50 FB      BVC $E006		; and this is waiting for end of operation.

E00B   AD 20 03   LDA $0320		; Read WD status.
E00E   A2 00      LDX #$00		; Set output pointer to 0.
E010   A9 01      LDA #$01
E012   8D 22 03   STA $0322		; Store 1 to WD sector register.
E015   A9 80      LDA #$80
E017   8D 20 03   STA $0320		; Store $80 to WD command register. That's read sector, no initial delay,


E01A   2C 12 03   BIT $0312		; Check IRQ and DRQ outputs from the WD.
E01D   70 10      BVS $E02F		; If the command has finished, jump off to E02F.
E01F   10 F9      BPL $E01A		; If there's not yet any more data to read, repeat the status read.

E021   AD 23 03   LDA $0323		; Read the next byte.
E024   9D 00 04   STA $0400,X		; Store to $400 + X
E027   E8         INX			; Increment X.
E028   4C 1A E0   JMP $E01A		; Go back to polling.

E02B   EA         NOP
E02C   EA         NOP
E02D   EA         NOP
E02E   EA         NOP

E02F   AD 20 03   LDA $0320
E032   29 9C      AND #$9C		; If the drive is signalling not ready, sector 1 wasn't found,
E034   D0 DF      BNE $E015		; it had a CRC error, or data was lost in transfer, try the read again.


E036   4C 00 04   JMP $0400		; Otherwise, branch to $400.

; i.e. Read sector 1 from track 0, which may be at most 256 bytes long, to $400,
; and execute it. If it doesn't load, retry until it does.
;
; Assuming a classic 5.25" drive, the ready signal implies motor on + two index holes passed.
; So it can be used approximately to evaluate completion of spin-up. If they shipped an
; IBM PC-style drive it'd instead indicate that the head had stepped and the disk had not been
; ejected since. We can probably assume the former, as a restore won't necessarily step the
; head — if it's already at track 0 then no motion will occur. So it's not really an indicator of
; anything in this code.
Vectors are NMI -> $022b, reset -> 0xe000, IRQ -> 0228, for the record. So guesses:
  • * the ROM is paged at startup; and
    * it's possibly incompatible with BASIC 1.1 (motivation for guess: it duplicates the 1.0 IRQ and NMI vectors, which differ from the 1.1).
EDIT: inspecting what we can therefore conclude is the boot sector reveals a weird result: it's a 512-byte sector. Which means that the ROM loop above will overwrite the first half with the second half. But also the sector itself just contains the same 256-byte sequence repeated twice. Disassembling that:

Code: Select all

                  * = 0400
0400   2C 11 03   BIT $0311
0403   2C 17 03   BIT $0317
0406   A9 1A      LDA #$1A
0408   8D 80 BB   STA $BB80
040B   A9 00      LDA #$00
040D   A0 68      LDY #$68
040F   85 60      STA $60
0411   84 61      STY $61
0413   A9 01      LDA #$01
0415   2C A9 00   BIT $00A9
0418   2C A9 07   BIT $07A9
041B   AA         TAX
041C   48         PHA
041D   49 01      EOR #$01
041F   29 03      AND #$03
0421   8D 23 03   STA $0323
0424   A9 13      LDA #$13
0426   8D 20 03   STA $0320
0429   2C 12 03   BIT $0312
042C   50 FB      BVC $0429
042E   AD 20 03   LDA $0320
0431   A0 FF      LDY #$FF
0433   E6 39      INC $39
0435   E6 39      INC $39
0437   88         DEY
0438   D0 F9      BNE $0433
043A   BD E0 04   LDA $04E0,X
043D   8D 22 03   STA $0322
0440   A0 00      LDY #$00
0442   A9 80      LDA #$80
0444   8D 20 03   STA $0320
0447   2C 12 03   BIT $0312
044A   70 12      BVS $045E
044C   10 F9      BPL $0447
044E   AD 23 03   LDA $0323
0451   91 60      STA ($60),Y
0453   C8         INY
0454   D0 F1      BNE $0447
0456   E6 61      INC $61
0458   4C 47 04   JMP $0447
045B   4C 00 04   JMP $0400
045E   AD 20 03   LDA $0320
0461   29 9C      AND #$9C
0463   D0 F6      BNE $045B
0465   E8         INX
0466   68         PLA
0467   48         PHA
0468   C9 07      CMP #$07
046A   D0 04      BNE $0470
046C   E0 0A      CPX #$0A
046E   B0 04      BCS $0474
0470   E0 0B      CPX #$0B
0472   90 C6      BCC $043A
0474   68         PLA
0475   F0 A2      BEQ $0419
0477   C9 01      CMP #$01
0479   F0 9B      BEQ $0416
047B   78         SEI
047C   D8         CLD
047D   A2 FF      LDX #$FF
047F   9A         TXS
0480   AD 80 03   LDA $0380
0483   A0 00      LDY #$00
0485   98         TYA
0486   99 00 00   STA $0000,Y
0489   99 00 02   STA $0200,Y
048C   99 37 98   STA $9837,Y
048F   C8         INY
0490   D0 F4      BNE $0486
0492   20 1C 95   JSR $951C
0495   A9 0C      LDA #$0C
0497   20 D4 96   JSR $96D4
049A   20 2E 6C   JSR $6C2E
049D   20 44 6F   JSR $6F44
04A0   B0 B9      BCS $045B
04A2   20 0A 96   JSR $960A
04A5   AD 01 C0   LDA $C001
04A8   C9 59      CMP #$59
04AA   F0 16      BEQ $04C2
04AC   20 B2 68   JSR $68B2
04AF   A9 03      LDA #$03
04B1   20 B8 73   JSR $73B8
04B4   90 0A      BCC $04C0
04B6   A9 EB      LDA #$EB
04B8   A0 04      LDY #$04
04BA   20 0C 73   JSR $730C
04BD   4C 7B 04   JMP $047B
04C0   A9 00      LDA #$00
04C2   8D FD 97   STA $97FD
04C5   A2 02      LDX #$02
04C7   BD DD 04   LDA $04DD,X
04CA   9D 05 E9   STA $E905,X
04CD   A9 3F      LDA #$3F
04CF   9D E0 02   STA $02E0,X
04D2   CA         DEX
04D3   10 F2      BPL $04C7
04D5   A9 60      LDA #$60
04D7   8D 09 F4   STA $F409
04DA   4C 00 C0   JMP $C000
04DD   4C 00 68   JMP $6800
04E0   01 03      ORA ($03,X)
04E2   05 07      ORA $07
04E4   09 0B      ORA #$0B
04E6   02         ???
04E7   04         ???
04E8   06 08      ASL $08
04EA   0A         ASL A
04EB   07         ???
04EC   2A         ROL A
04ED   45 52      EOR $52
04EF   52         ???
04F0   2D 4E 4F   AND $4F4E
04F3   20 43 4F   JSR $4F43
04F6   4D 2E 2A   EOR $2A2E
04F9   3F         ???
04FA   0D 0A 00   ORA $000A
04FD   D4         ???
04FE   C5 C5      CMP $C5
0500              .END
One further quick observation before bed: the supplied disk is an MFM_DISK but appears to use longer-than-usual tracks. For now I'm detecting this by just not truncating any sector that is in-progress when you hit the 6250 byte mark. I guess if there's only one BD-DOS disk image in existence then whether to think of that as a rule is somewhat moot. But otherwise I was truncating sector 11, leading inevitably to a portion of nonsense and a CRC error when reading.

I have so far implemented:
  • a WD1973;
  • with motors tied to a head load request, but head loaded signalled only when a drive is signalling ready.
... and that gets me beyond the boot sector, and a few sectors further, to needing to figure out the expectations around the non-WD registers. I have Fabrice's notes, so will proceed with those.

As an aside, tying the head load request directly to the head loaded input might work on real drives; mine still reach their proper velocity instantaneously so I declined to do that because then sectors will be loaded before they're signalling ready, which causes BD-DOS to enter a temporary retry loop in its boot ROM and a perpetual one in its boot sector. As long as a real drive takes at least two revolutions to reach full speed I don't think that should be an issue (and these are reputedly 5.25" drives, so we're talking a real physical index hole, not a virtual one, meaning it'll signal even at low speeds).

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Fabrice's notes are a little vague on what accesses other than to the WD do (at least when read through automated translation), so I am brute-forcing the problem, with slightly weird results.

Per Fabrice, the accesses other than to the WD are probably to Apple/Pravetz-esque soft switches. I seemed to find accesses to $310, $313, $314 and $317 to be most prevalent, and decided that probably they equate to two addresses that enable or disable overlay RAM, and two addresses that enable or disable the Byte Drive ROM.

If those guesses are accurate then that gives 24 possible arrangements between switches and functions. Not too many to brute force.

Surprise! More than one arrangement therein seems to give a working BD-DOS. I haven't yet been thorough enough to spot the commonalities and differences between those that work and those that don't.

In the meantime, here's that disk's 'RUN ME':
Clock Signal Screen Shot 15-01-2020, 20.30.44 GMT-5.png
Clock Signal Screen Shot 15-01-2020, 20.30.44 GMT-5.png (8.51 KiB) Viewed 3444 times

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Further notes, probably the final for today:

The boot sector accesses $0311 and $0317 only. It has a check for BASIC 1.0 (at 04a5–04aa in the disassembly above). Therefore either $0311 or $0317 must disable the disk ROM, and the other must do something else. It seems safe to respond to either and ignore the other. Definitely neither enables overlay RAM.

Using $0313 to enable overlay RAM and $0310 to disable it certainly seems to be sufficient to get to the boot prompt.

It strikes me now that there may well be no means to re-enable the disk ROM, as it doesn't do anything useful once the machine is booted.

Further reading on the Byte Drive 500 reveals it usually came with a 3" drive, though I did find at least one instance of it for sale with a 5.25" drive.

The bottom of a directory listing says 'DR0 282 sectors free'. So the interface likely supports multiple drives. Between that and the 5.25" drive version, it is possible that some of the other accesses select drive and/or disk side. I could find no way to change drive.

The supplied sample disk is single sided and 40 tracks.

One article I found suggested that the team behind the Byte Drive had licensed CP/M and were planning to offer that in some capacity for some machines. It's therefore also possible that some of the switches control single/double density mode.

When booting normally, the real Oric is careful to put itself into PAL mode. BD-DOS makes no such attempt. So there is a risk of restarting in NTSC mode, depending on memory contents after reset.

I don't yet have a complete concept of the logic behind motor control, but since the boot ROM loads a sector without touching any of the presumed soft switches, we can assume it's automatic.

EDIT: as per its announcement thread, I've thrown out a version of my emulator that implements behaviour as above. I strongly suspect there's a lot more to learn here though.

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Some more quick observations on this, relevant to yesterday's botched release:

The boot ROM performs: seek to 0, read boot sector, check for errors (including drive not ready).

Somewhere between then and the command prompt, the logic changes to: (i) issue a force interrupt and check for drive not ready; (ii) only if drive is ready, issue fetch.

My understanding of Shugart RDY is that it goes active when the disk is spinning and two index holes have passed, and inactive when the motor is off. I decided to check some old Shugart OEM manuals. Frustratingly they pretty much all tell you that's correct for RDY becoming active, and decline to comment on if/when it'll go inactive again.

In the optional 'disk change' output section they state that the disk change output will be active "if while deselected the drive has gone from a ready to a Not Ready (Door Open) condition". Though elsewhere it is strongly implied that they expect users to have the motor on permanently so I'm not sure what to read into that.

They also mention a 'ready modified' jumper with which "the Ready Circuit is modified so that the drive will stay ready" (specifically because single-sided drives definitely otherwise set ready to false if you try to use the second side, so that option is supposed to let you check sidedness without losing RDY).

Therefore I've currently no completely compelling answer as to when the Byte Drive 500's drive is expected to signal RDY. I've gone with a variant of the modified scheme above — RDY will be set after initial motor on and after two index holes have passed. It will be reset only if the disk is ejected.

That causes BD-DOS fully to function.

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

Partial disassembly of the boot sector:

Code: Select all

                  * = 0400
0400   2C 11 03   BIT $0311	; Unknown purpose.
0403   2C 17 03   BIT $0317	; Unknown purpose.

0406   A9 1A      LDA #$1A
0408   8D 80 BB   STA $BB80	; $BB80 = $1A
040B   A9 00      LDA #$00
040D   A0 68      LDY #$68
040F   85 60      STA $60
0411   84 61      STY $61	; ($60).w = $6800; this is where data from disk will be loaded to.
0413   A9 01      LDA #$01
0415   2C A9 00   BIT $00A9	; Unknown purpose.
0418   2C A9 07   BIT $07A9	; Unknown purpose.
041B   AA         TAX		; X seems to be a current track counter; seed it to 1.
041C   48         PHA		; Also put $01 on the stack, as a current sector pointer.
041D   49 01      EOR #$01
041F   29 03      AND #$03
0421   8D 23 03   STA $0323	; Store (a ^ 1)&3 to the WD data register — seek tracks in ascending order despite the descending variable.
0424   A9 13      LDA #$13
0426   8D 20 03   STA $0320	; Begin command $13, i.e. a seek to track (a ^ 1)&3
0429   2C 12 03   BIT $0312
042C   50 FB      BVC $0429	; Wait until command is finished.
042E   AD 20 03   LDA $0320	; Read the status (to clear the interrupt bit?)

0431   A0 FF      LDY #$FF	; Y = $ff

0433   E6 39      INC $39
0435   E6 39      INC $39	; Perform $39 += 2, 255 times. At completion: Y = 0, $39 is 2 higher.
0437   88         DEY		; $39 is not used elsewhere, so this is likely just a wait loop with a
0438   D0 F9      BNE $0433	; harmless side effect.

043A   BD E0 04   LDA $04E0,X	; Map from logical sector in X to physical sector in A
043D   8D 22 03   STA $0322	; Store desired sector to the sector register
0440   A0 00      LDY #$00	; Set output pointer to 0
0442   A9 80      LDA #$80
0444   8D 20 03   STA $0320	; Initiate command $80 (i.e. read sector)

0447   2C 12 03   BIT $0312	; Check status.
044A   70 12      BVS $045E	; If read sector is finished, exit loop to $045e.
044C   10 F9      BPL $0447	; If no new byte is ready yet, loop back to checking status.

044E   AD 23 03   LDA $0323	; Read new data byte.
0451   91 60      STA ($60),Y	; Store  byte.
0453   C8         INY
0454   D0 F1      BNE $0447
0456   E6 61      INC $61
0458   4C 47 04   JMP $0447	; Increment output pointer; increment Y first, increment $61 if there's carry.

045B   4C 00 04   JMP $0400
045E   AD 20 03   LDA $0320	; Enter here upon completion of a read sector.
0461   29 9C      AND #$9C
0463   D0 F6      BNE $045B	; If the post-read-sector status indicates any of: drive not ready, CRC error,
				; sector not found, data not completely read, retry the whole process from step 1.

0465   E8         INX
0466   68         PLA
0467   48         PHA		; Increment X, get A back from the top of the stack (and leave it there).
				; This appears to be a current sector count.
0468   C9 07      CMP #$07
046A   D0 04      BNE $0470
046C   E0 0A      CPX #$0A
046E   B0 04      BCS $0474	; If that was sector 7 of track 10, stop.

0470   E0 0B      CPX #$0B
0472   90 C6      BCC $043A
0474   68         PLA
0475   F0 A2      BEQ $0419	; This is impossible in the code as given, so presumably modification occurs?
0477   C9 01      CMP #$01
0479   F0 9B      BEQ $0416	; As above.

047B   78         SEI
047C   D8         CLD

047D   A2 FF      LDX #$FF
047F   9A         TXS

0480   AD 80 03   LDA $0380
0483   A0 00      LDY #$00
0485   98         TYA
0486   99 00 00   STA $0000,Y
0489   99 00 02   STA $0200,Y
048C   99 37 98   STA $9837,Y
048F   C8         INY
0490   D0 F4      BNE $0486	; Zero out the zero page, page 2 and the 256 bytes from $9837

0492   20 1C 95   JSR $951C
0495   A9 0C      LDA #$0C
0497   20 D4 96   JSR $96D4
049A   20 2E 6C   JSR $6C2E
049D   20 44 6F   JSR $6F44
04A0   B0 B9      BCS $045B
04A2   20 0A 96   JSR $960A
04A5   AD 01 C0   LDA $C001
04A8   C9 59      CMP #$59
04AA   F0 16      BEQ $04C2
04AC   20 B2 68   JSR $68B2
04AF   A9 03      LDA #$03
04B1   20 B8 73   JSR $73B8
04B4   90 0A      BCC $04C0
04B6   A9 EB      LDA #$EB
04B8   A0 04      LDY #$04
04BA   20 0C 73   JSR $730C
04BD   4C 7B 04   JMP $047B
04C0   A9 00      LDA #$00
04C2   8D FD 97   STA $97FD
04C5   A2 02      LDX #$02
04C7   BD DD 04   LDA $04DD,X
04CA   9D 05 E9   STA $E905,X
04CD   A9 3F      LDA #$3F
04CF   9D E0 02   STA $02E0,X
04D2   CA         DEX
04D3   10 F2      BPL $04C7
04D5   A9 60      LDA #$60
04D7   8D 09 F4   STA $F409
04DA   4C 00 C0   JMP $C000
04DD   4C 00 68   JMP $6800
04E0  
	; Logical to physical sector mapping table:

	db	$01, $03, $05, $07, $09, $0b, $02, $04, $06, $08, $0a

	; Text:

	ds 	"\a*ERR-NO COM.*?\r\n\0"

04FD   D4         ???
04FE   C5 C5      CMP $C5
0500              .END

User avatar
iss
Wing Commander
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:43 pm
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by iss »

ThomH wrote:
Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:08 am

Code: Select all

                  * = 0400
....................................
0415   2C A9 00   BIT $00A9	; Unknown purpose.
0418   2C A9 07   BIT $07A9	; Unknown purpose.
....................................
0475   F0 A2      BEQ $0419	; This is impossible in the code as given, so presumably modification occurs?
0477   C9 01      CMP #$01
0479   F0 9B      BEQ $0416	; As above.
....................................
Here the $2C opcode (i.e. BIT instruction) is used to mask following 2 bytes.
Then the jumps at $0475 and $0479 make perfect sense :).

Code: Select all

                  * = 0400
....................................
0415   2C         NOP       ; BIT opcode is used to mask next LDA imm. instruction
0416   A9 00      LDA #$00
0418   2C         NOP       ; BIT opcode is used to mask next LDA imm. instruction
0419   A9 07      LDA #$07
....................................
0475   F0 A2      BEQ $0419 ; Jump to load A with #$07
0477   C9 01      CMP #$01
0479   F0 9B      BEQ $0416 ; Jump to load A with #$00
....................................
Cool code and remarkable are 2 things:
- can load sectors with bigger size than 256 bytes;
- uses sector interleave (i.e. logical to physical mapping) - it's interesting how effective it's actually? Recently I've played bit with the Jasmin loader code to use interleave, but because of many conversions DSK->HFE->FlashFloppy internal data interpretation it's not clear if the interleave in the DSK still "de facto" preserved.

BTW, your post is just in time (again) for me - I'm wondering if I can support booting with Byte Drive 500 hardware together with Jasmin/Microdisc/8D-FDC ;).

User avatar
mikeb
Flying Officer
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:03 pm
Location: West Midlands, UK
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by mikeb »

Code: Select all

0400   2C 11 03   BIT $0311	; Unknown purpose.
0403   2C 17 03   BIT $0317	; Unknown purpose.
The comment from @iss relating to the other BIT instructions is a good observation, and it's always interesting when tricks like that slide into assembler :)

The above two however I would say are NOT used to "hide" instructions in the same way. Note the addresses. These are effectively reads from I/O locations, $0300-$030F is the onboard 6522 VIA, $0310+ would be registers/flipflops on the disc interface. Someone with more experience of the specifics of the disk hardware could chip in here to confirm, but I believe this is resetting/setting some hardware in the disc interface ...

On a Cumana interface, $0311 is the track register of the FDC chip (is this a quick way to select track 0?) and $0317 doesn't seem to be decoded.

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

From testing different combinations, I'm actually pretty sure that one of those BITs is responsible for disabling the BASIC ROM. I don't know what the other does, and I don't know which is which.

I considered that maybe the side select is undefined at startup on the BD-500, the intention being just to put the same boot sector on both sides and deal with it in software, but since it shipped with a single-sided drive and correspondingly we have only a single-sided disk image for testing, that's massive speculation.

There are some other mystery accesses in the DOS itself, but I haven't yet disassembled that. I've just been watching the address accesses. I could also venture a pretty random guess that some of them might be drive selection, but that's also plucked out of thin air.

Pretty much all that does seem certain is that motor control is automatic (or else it'd never boot), so none of the mystery accesses are likely to be related to that, and the FDC is the standard WD type so ditto stuff like stepping is automated. I guess there might also be an exposed FM/MFM selector.

User avatar
ibisum
Wing Commander
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:56 am
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ibisum »

Is the other BIT maybe for ROM bank select?

ThomH
Flying Officer
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:55 pm

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by ThomH »

I currently suspect $310 and $313 as enable and disable overlay RAM respectively, and $317 as disable BASIC ROM. Though that definitely could be $311.

That being said, I notice that the code at 04A5 is likely a test for BASIC 1.0, so very possibly I'm wrong about the function of _both_ $311 and $317.

To quote someone smarter, if online translation is reliable, then Fabrice's thoughts were:
$0310: switch on the RAM overlay?
$0311: ?
$0312: DRQ/IRQ status register
$0313: switches on the ROM?
$0314: switches on the RAM overlay? But can leave the EPROM visible?
$0315: ?
$0316: deselection of the lower 8kb of the EPROM overlap to allow access to the RAM overlay?
$0317: EPROM access? If the EPROM is 8kb, 8kb of overlay RAM is visible too?

Or does $0317 plus $0314 give access to the EPROM in reading and the RAM in writing?

User avatar
mikeb
Flying Officer
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:03 pm
Location: West Midlands, UK
Contact:

Re: Is BD-DOS lost to time?

Post by mikeb »

ThomH wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 7:55 pm
possibly I'm wrong about the function of _both_ $311 and $317.
$0310-$03FF is definitely going to be I/O to the disk hardware. Beyond that, ?

If someone has a proper schematic of this board, then what the addresses do can be derived from the schematic, otherwise it's either guesswork or relying on someone having documented source code :)

At least some copies of the Cumana disk interface circuit have hand added annotations of what different lines enable, based on decoding out the address bus (and then further, by chasing into the documented registers of the FDC chip, and an 8-bit latch used for miscellaneous on-board stuff, e.g. side 1/2, drive 0-1-2-3 select, Ext boot rom or not etc. but they don't seem to align with this, as $317 isn't anything at all on there.

Need schematics ...

Post Reply