Search found 272 matches
- Sun May 05, 2019 5:52 pm
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
Re: OSDK 1.14 RC
Strange: [...] (Just noticed that the #file paths are not pointing to the right path, they seem to use the current working directory instead of actual path) are you using the exact version downloaded, or is it a modified/recompiled version? C:\Users\laurent\Desktop\dev\Oric\Sources\Tests\bug div\ma...
- Sun May 05, 2019 2:29 am
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
Re: OSDK 1.14 RC
New weekend, new version: http://www.osdk.org/files/osdk_1_14_rc3.zip Nice, thanks! \(^^)/ with a special thanks from Fabrice saying "Please thank Neko, he is the only one doing his tests in -O0 so that's why he finds all these problems". You are making me blush. (^^;) Fabrice is obviousl...
- Sat May 04, 2019 1:19 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Oric logo and trademark
- Replies: 41
- Views: 34453
Re: Oric logo and trademark
>I'm afraid he's far too busy with real life right now. Then perhaps we ought to have a call to arms in the Oric community to ensure we are safe from these criminals. A trademark is something you buy the rights to. That company asserts that it owns the trademark so this means they bought the rights...
- Sat May 04, 2019 1:09 am
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
- Sat May 04, 2019 12:57 am
- Forum: Demos
- Topic: OricExos - making the impossible
- Replies: 156
- Views: 113818
Re: OricExos - making the impossible
So, regarding this emulator build, it is not a new "exos mode" in Oricutron, it's actually a dedicated version of Oricutron that always boot in Exos mode, correct? Absolutely correct - it's OricExos dedicated version and I think this the right way to go - no need to "damage" mai...
- Sat May 04, 2019 12:49 am
- Forum: Hardware hacks and extensions
- Topic: Securing sources of (official) Oric chips
- Replies: 12
- Views: 10431
Re: Securing sources of (official) Oric chips
... there must be something about Bulgaria attracting Oric users :) ... This 'something' is called Pravetz-8D :D. All Pravetz-8D are equipped with original ULA's! I really don't think that someone here ordered chips from CDI for Pravetz-8D production but they got them as you said from re-sellers. I...
- Wed May 01, 2019 1:51 am
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
Re: OSDK 1.14 RC
I got another bug with 1.14 RC2 which did not exist in 1.13 (no idea about 1.14RC since I did not test with it). What happens is that this line appears in linked.s, which obviously cannot be assembled since it is invalid syntax: beq *+8 : asl tmp : rol : dex : bne *-4 : ldx tmp :(tmp0,tmp1,tmp0) th...
- Wed May 01, 2019 1:35 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Oric logo and trademark
- Replies: 41
- Views: 34453
Re: Oric logo and trademark
Holy kitty, it looks like they are trying to acquire the entirety of retro stuff on earth.
- Wed May 01, 2019 12:14 am
- Forum: Hardware hacks and extensions
- Topic: Securing sources of (official) Oric chips
- Replies: 12
- Views: 10431
Securing sources of (official) Oric chips
Hello kitties, Chema just posted a link to an eBay vendor for an Oric ULA (cf http://forum.defence-force.org/viewtopic.php?p=19421#p19421). This raised my interest because that vendor obviously has a lot of them for sale so they must have access to a back-then official stock of Oric chips. Since all...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:56 pm
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
Re: OSDK 1.14 RC
The comments seem to assume that clockValue contains 1, so maybe a minimum program would not call "clock()" but just have "unsigned long clockValue = 1;" and the #include <time.h>" could also be removed :) No no no ;). That is precisely the bug! \oO;/ As I mentioned in the ...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Oric logo and trademark
- Replies: 41
- Views: 34453
Re: Oric logo and trademark
Licence wise, can any of the actual good emulators (Euphoric, Oricutron, Clock, ...) be used in a commercial product? Good question. I think it is indeed a good idea to use non-commercial licenses for emulators. This has the double advantage of not having one's work used unduly by someone else for ...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:41 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: A possible software alternative to Vsync?
- Replies: 47
- Views: 55867
Re: A possible software alternative to Vsync?
IMO, there should be no drifting - at least because both signals are generated from the same source clock 12MHz and yes, VIA clock is stable and precise enough :). Fantastic, that is good to know. Thanks! Thanks iss. I knew it was you :) That being said, I had to change something... probably the VI...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:24 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Oric logo and trademark
- Replies: 41
- Views: 34453
Re: Oric logo and trademark
Nothing to worry about really and the last link is actually not related at all to the first two. Trademarks expire automatically if not manually renewed and the Oric trademark was available for quite a long time most likely. The guys responsible for the C64 mini and other retro merchandise took adva...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:01 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: A possible software alternative to Vsync?
- Replies: 47
- Views: 55867
Re: A possible software alternative to Vsync?
I tried an implementation someone (iss?) sent me in Blake's 7, to avoid problems with the cursor.[snip] Done :) check http://miniserve.defence-force.org/viewvc/projet1/users/chema/Blakes7/Sources/auxiliar.s?revision=1460&view=markup Thanks Chema! Use the original source code (attached vsync-aut...
- Tue Apr 30, 2019 3:28 am
- Forum: Cross development tools
- Topic: OSDK 1.14 RC
- Replies: 25
- Views: 20441
Re: OSDK 1.14 RC
It was in the original post: bug fixes for float to int conversions, etc... Gargl! I am soooo blind. :( I promise to wake up before reading new posts next time. ;) Your last post on the other thread was on the April 13, which is the same day as when I posted the 1.14 RC, and your post does not say ...